Sunday, November 30, 2008

Green Building Pays Back

Yet another report in the steady stream... this one takes a straightforward approach to the present value of energy savings ($7-14 per sq. ft.) vs. incremental cost ($3-$8 psf)...

In addition, it also takes a crack at quantifying public benefits such as health benefits and increased transportation savings.

Click here for the full report from Good Energies.

Need to reduce energy in buildings by 1.6% annually

According to the "Green Building Impact Report," the carbon "footprint" of U.S. commercial buildings will need to decline steadily each year by roughly 1.6% — a total of 14% improvement between 2000 and 2008 — to reach a goal of 80% reduction by 2050. The good news is that LEED buildings are ahead of this goal in terms of their own performance. The bad news is that the entire building sector must be hitting these reduction targets.

View the full report here.

Friday, November 28, 2008

Green Building Insurance Risks

Yet another nuance of Green Building...

Global Energy Efficiency Studies

This post courtesy of information from the blog Our Green Journey by Lisa Galley.

The IEA recently calculated that 25% of final global energy use could be eliminated through energy efficiency in existing buildings!

Following up on that, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) recently studied 1 trillion sq ft of data to estimate what might be accomplished by reducing energy demand and CO2 by jumping over three barriers: organizational, financial, and behavioral. The study is long, but quite revealing.

Friday, November 21, 2008

New High-Efficiency Window Prototype Result of DOE Partnership

A bit futuristic, but quite interesting... and I happen to be working on a market study for these windows right now!

http://www.energy.gov/news/4501.htm

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

State Senator Steinberg - SB 375

Senator Steinberg should be commended for pushing this bill through the CA State Senate. SB 375 will expedite planning and review processes for projects that reduce Vehicle Miles Travelled. The bill itself is more complex, and if you're interested in learning more, read below.

This short video shows him speaking at the Capitol.

TITLE - Californian Senator Darryl Steinberg (28 Oct 2008) – hosted by

California Center for Environmental Law and Public Policy

 

Talk described the passage of the Senate Bill 375 for transport and

land use planning.  The bill aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

from transportation by reducing vehicles miles travelled.  Address

urban sprawl and control development in ways to minimize commuting

distances and vehicle km by better aligning the location of housing

and workplaces.  Passage of the bill occurred when municipalities,

developers, environmentalists and state government we able to reach a

consensus – “everyone gave up a little and gave a lot”.

 

By 2011, all major transport funds for capex projects will need to be

approved under SB 375.

 

In the past there have been major coordinated planning obstacles in

California as vested interests and different levels of government have

squabbled over control and fought for their slice of the development

pie, even if this increased environmental impact.

 

The main enabling event that allowed the planning bill to pass was the

earlier passage of the greenhouse gas reduction bill AB32.  California

is now legally bound to meet very aggressive carbon reduction targets

by 2020.  This was a major intervening event that gained support for

aligning interests.

 

Senator Steinberg is very interested in green job creation, but we do

not seem to be entirely clear about what this means yet.  He is

generally supportive of high speed rail, and sees this as a catalyst

for new industry and jobs, while environmentally favorable.  He sees

the environmental targets in AB 32 also related to the agenda of

improved education and social justice

Shai Agassi - Project Better Place

This is possibly the best and most thought-provoking speech I've ever seen. Shai Agassi discusses his personal story and the evolution of Project Better Place

Monday, November 10, 2008

U.S. Legislation Regulating Carbon: Cap and Trade or Tax?

The economist's take on the issue is in favor of a tax over a cap-and-trade system is given in the article below. Former Haas Dean Tom Campbell also agrees. His point is that the incentive to innovate never stops, and attempting to measure 1990 or some past year's levels is both impossible and arbitrary. I agree.

Al Gore Editorial in NY Times

Al Gore presents five key strategies to fight global warming NOW, and as always, some compelling anectodes... note the discussion of energy efficiency in buildings... LEED-EB to the rescue!

Saturday, November 1, 2008

AirAdvice Technology

I found this on Building Energy Performance News. Really interesting technology. They've developed a system to measure energy peformance and translate it into estimates of financial savings, impact on LEED status, and more. Read on...


And on their website, they discuss their LEED consulting: