Monday, June 29, 2009

Waxman-Markey Bill Highlights for Green Building

Last week, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Waxman-Markey bill, which sets up a cap and trade market for carbon credits, and also includes a variety of energy efficiency measures which may be the most relevant for the real estate industry.

Thank you to bloggers Shari Shapiro and Chris Cheatham for sifting through the bill and lifting out the important Green Building and Energy Efficiency clauses. To give them their appropriate credit, click here for the full article. After reading the article, I found the following items particularly relevant for real estate:

Section 201 (National Energy Efficiency Building Codes): Sets energy efficiency targets for the national building code: “on the date of enactment of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, 30 percent reduction in energy use relative to a comparable building constructed in compliance with the baseline code…effective January 1, 2014, for residential buildings, and January 1, 2015, for commercial buildings, 50 percent reduction in energy use relative to the baseline code; and…January 1, 2017, for residential buildings, and January 1, 2018, for commercial buildings, and every 3 years thereafter, respectively, through January 1, 2029, and January 1, 2030, 5 percent additional reduction in energy use relative to the baseline code.” As Shari and Chris point out, this is a significant shift in what has historically been a state and local issue. Definitely stay tuned on this one!

Section 131 & 132: SEED Funds and PACE Bonds: One of the programs that can be funded by these allocation are Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Bonds. PACE bonds involve loans to commercial and residential property owners to finance energy retrofits. Through the interest generated on these bonds, a revolving fund is established to allow for even more retrofits to occur. Already, California and Missouri have announced plans to use funding from the Department of Energy State Energy Program to establish PACE bond programs. Look for more states to jump on the PACE bond bandwagon and use cap-and-trade revenue to fund similar programs.

Section 202: REEP Program: With the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the Department of Energy’s State Energy Program received billons of dollars. Under the Waxman-Markey bill, the State Energy Program will again receive billions of dollars for more energy efficiency retrofits. From the Pew Center on Climate Change (PDF):"This section requires the Secretary of Energy to develop a Retrofit for Energy and Environmental Performance (REEP) program to facilitate building retrofit programs for energy efficiency and efficient water use. Funding will be made available through REEP to the State Energy Programs for state and local efforts, including audits, incentives, technical assistance, and training. States are permitted to choose funding mechanisms, with options including credit support, such as interest rate subsidies or credit enhancement, providing initial capital, and allocating funds for utility programs."


The Green Act: On May 7, 2009, Rep. Ed Perlmutter (D-Colorado) introduced H.R. 2336, the Green Resources for Energy Efficient Neighborhoods Act of 2009 (“GREEN ACT”). According to Perlmutter’s office, “The GREEN Act provides incentives to lenders and financial institutions to provide lower interest loans and other benefits to consumers, who build, buy or remodel their homes and businesses to improve their energy efficiency and use of alternative energy.”

The full impact of this bill, or any final version of climate legislation that is signed into law is undoubtedly going to have a profound impact on the real estate industry. These items are a sliver of the legislation that will / would be relevant. I encourage everyone to do their own digging because turning hundreds and hundreds of pages of legalese into concise, actionable, and searchable databases for us to act with good information is going to be the biggest challenge in making sure that our energy efficiency investments pay back in the shortest time possible. The greater the payback that early actors can demonstrate, the more appealing it will be for the masses, which is something we all should strive for!

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Green Building Finance & Investment Forum - Part 1: Pension Funds Perspectives

I was privilaged to attend the Green Building Finance & Investment Forum West on March 3rd & 4th at the Hyatt in San Francisco. The lead sponsor, Lisa Galley, of Galley Eco Capital, once again went above and beyond my expectations in planning the most interesting and beneficial conference I have ever attended. Not to disparage the other green building conferences out there, because they all play an important role, but... this was the first time I have heard a critical mass of real estate owners, operators, investors, and lenders, all talking shop in actual real estate language. Also, the breadth and depth of the keynote speakers, panelists, and attendees was outstanding. I had the chance to interact with some quite heavy hitters with whom I look forward to remaining in contact throughout my professional career.

Over the next few weeks, I will release a series of blog entries summarizing the 30+ pages of notes I took at the conference.

Here is my first entry, summarizing the viewpoints shared in the first panel, titled Pension Funds Perspectives. The panel was moderated by Leanne Tobias, of Malachite LLC, based in suburban DC. Panelists included Liz Diamond from AFL-CIO Housing Investment Trust, Lyz Ferguson from the Bay Area Family of Funds, Preston Sargent from Kennedy Associates, and Cherie Santos-Wuest, from TIAA-CREF.

When asked if this was the time to be considering green building considering the economic environment, Santos-Wuest answered without hesitation that green building is even more relevant as a result of the downturn. In her view, there is no justification for constructing a new building that is anything less than LEED-Gold. She also mentioned that green strategies do well to prepare for the regulatory future, which is now in some jurisdictions already, including San Francisco, Boston, and the District of Columbia.

Sargent attributed the swing to pressure from their investors, such as CalPERS, the largest public pension fund in the world, and also one of the most progressive. According to Sargent, institutional players would not be demanding green buildings unless they see a bottom line benefit, as many now clearly do.

One challenge that real estate investment managers are facing is rebalancing, which occurs when pension funds whose mandates set limits on the real estate share of total assets suffer larger losses in other investments and therefore must dispose of some of their real estate assets in order to restore required ratios. This is also known as the denominator effect. An additional challenge relating to falling asset values is that it is difficult to value investments in today's maketplace because there are so few sales, especially of green buildings.

Diamond identified non-traditional investors, such as foundations and public-private partnerships (PPPs), and other mission-based investors as potential sources of capital in such a challenging environment. Sargent identified Kennedy's experience with PPPs, including the Port of Portland, one of the largest LEED-certified industrial buildings.

Panelists also mentioned the benefits they see in owning green buildings. This is nothing new to those of us who have been following the movement for some time, but it was good to hear those with skin in the game identify these factors as well. They include: tenants stay longer, and have a higher probability of renewal (underwritten to 85-90%), tenants come sooner (given the choice, tenants prefer green spaces first), and they do not want to build into obselecense.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

9 of 10 would pay more for Green Space

In a UK Survey, nearly nine in ten commercial tenants say they would pay more to secure a sustainable building. Read the full article here.

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Underwriting Standards for Sustainable Investments

Pioneered by the Capital Markets Partnership and the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the standards are available for purchase here.

For background on the participants, click here.

Carbon Credits for Green Buildings

This white paper by Donald Simon from the law fim Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean provides a fantastic overview of the value green buildings can have in a state / country with a cap & trade system for CO2 emissions.

Mr. Simon has been awarded the "Green Building Super-Hero" award by the Northern California chapter of the US Green Building Council, and introduced Al Gore at West Coast Green earlier this year. He is also an expert on the evolving practice of Green Leasing.

Click here for the paper

CA Moves Toward Cap and Trade

One component of the CA plan to reduce CO2 emissions is energy efficiency in buildings. Look for incentives to increase building efficiency in the near term.


For an understanding of how a cap and trade system would benefit owners of green buildings, see my post immediately following this one

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Green Building Pays Back

Yet another report in the steady stream... this one takes a straightforward approach to the present value of energy savings ($7-14 per sq. ft.) vs. incremental cost ($3-$8 psf)...

In addition, it also takes a crack at quantifying public benefits such as health benefits and increased transportation savings.

Click here for the full report from Good Energies.